Review Article

THE RELATIONSHIP OF HUNTING TOURISM AND NATURAL TOURISM

Oguz Cam * Hakkı Çılgınoğlu
The Turkish PDF is shown because full text is not available in this language.
Full Text PDF · PDF

Abstract

Today, tourists are turning towards different alternative tourism types and alternative tourism mobility is becoming widespread. Nature and hunting tourism types are among the alternative tourism types and provide important advantages in terms of tourism demand. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between hunting tourism and nature tourism. In this way, the connection between hunting tourism and nature tourism has been emphasised and information of geographical and touristic importance has been provided to the literature. The method of the study is review. In this context, traditional review method was used. The process of the study is structured on finding information about nature and hunting tourism types in the literature and evaluating them in a relational context. In the information and evaluations on the subject, it was tried to focus on the elements related to tourism and geography. As a result, there is an important relationship between nature and hunting tourism types. The touristic source of these two types of tourism is based on nature. The existence of nature assumes the function of an important power source for humans and other living things to sustain their lives. The scenery offered by nature to living creatures is a factor with a high attraction potential that activates the tourists' pleasure of watching and provides the formation of touristic travel. The importance of this factor in terms of tourism is at a high level. Tourism planning and marketing are also directed on the basis of this factor. Nature is home to many plants and animals of different species and numbers. In addition, nature is an important source and determinant of hunting and wildlife. Therefore, the existence of nature is needed for hunting tourism activities. Nature tourism also derives its touristic existence and power from nature.

Keywords: Hunt; Hunting; Nature; Hunting Tourism; Nature Tourism.

References

  1. Akoğlan Kozak, M. ve Bahçe, A. S. (2009). Özel ilgi turizmi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  2. Akyol, C. (2017, 23-24 Ekim). Artvin İlinin doğa turizmi açısından değerlendirilmesi. DOKAP Bölgesi Uluslararası Turizm Sempozyumu içinde (s. 150-157). [Sempozyum]. DOKAP Bölgesi Uluslararası Turizm Sempozyumu, Trabzon, Türkiye.
  3. Ardoin, N. M., Wheaton, M., Bowers, A. W., Hunt, C. A. ve Durham, W. H. (2015). Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6, 838-858. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258.
  4. Avcı, M. ve Deniz, Y. S. (2022). Sağlık turizminde tabiat odaklı terapötik destinasyon önerisi: Kastamonu Horma Kanyonu örneği. Uluslararası Global Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 51-62.
  5. Campbell, L. (2002). Making nature your business. A guide for starting a nature tourism business in the Lone Star State. (Third Revision). Austin: Texas Parks and Wildlife.
  6. Çakır, R. A. (2018). Turizmin bölgesel kalkınmaya etkileri: Ayder turizm bölgesi örneği (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi.
  7. Çam, O. ve Avcı, M. (2021). Schwartz değerler sistemi kapsamında turist davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi: İstanbul örneği. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(3), 2037-2059. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.839016.
  8. Çam, O. ve Çelik, C. (2022). Evaluation of Bocuk Night within the framework of faith tourism events. Journal of Applied Tourism Research, 3(1), 37-56.

How to Cite

APA

Cam, O., & Çılgınoğlu, H. (2024). AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 262-277. https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL

AMA

1.Cam O, Çılgınoğlu H. AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ. SİTA. 2024;7(2):262-277. https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL

Chicago

Cam, Oguz, ve Hakkı Çılgınoğlu. 2024. “AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 (2): 262-77. https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL.

EndNote

Cam O, Çılgınoğlu H (01 Aralık 2024) AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 2 262–277.

IEEE

[1]O. Cam ve H. Çılgınoğlu, “AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ”, SİTA, c. 7, sy 2, ss. 262–277, Ara. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL

ISNAD

Cam, Oguz - Çılgınoğlu, Hakkı. “AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi 7/2 (01 Aralık 2024): 262-277. https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL.

JAMA

1.Cam O, Çılgınoğlu H. AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ. SİTA. 2024;7:262–277.

MLA

Cam, Oguz, ve Hakkı Çılgınoğlu. “AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 7, sy 2, Aralık 2024, ss. 262-77, https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL.

Vancouver

1.Oguz Cam, Hakkı Çılgınoğlu. AV TURİZMİ VE TABİAT TURİZMİ İLİŞKİSİ. SİTA [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2024;7(2):262-77. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA72MS68XL